If you like this blog

Don't miss Kevin Barrett's radio shows! And visit TruthJihad.com for more...

Tuesday, December 27, 2016

Kevin Barrett, Anthony Hall and Mark Bruzonsky LIVE on Election Night 2016 - Press TV



On election night, before we even knew who would be annointed, we predicted the next US president would be a slave of Israel.

Trump has already proven us right – and he hasn't even taken office yet.

Sunday, December 25, 2016

Our conception of God isn't big enough


According to Aldous Huxley, the brain’s main function is not to create consciousness, but to reduce it.
That would explain why primates with very big brains start wars, excrete in drinking water, vote for major party candidates in national elections, and otherwise exhibit a level of consciousness far below that of your average self-respecting rock.
Here is the Huxley quote in full:
To make biological survival possible, Mind at Large has to be funnelled through the reducing valve of the brain and nervous system.
Huxley’s point, a good one, is that our conception of mind, consciousness, or whatever-you-want-to-call-it just isn’t big enough.
The same is true for our conception of God.
In a few days, Christians all over the world will be celebrating a certain conception of God. Here in the USA, they have been preparing for the big event by chopping down small trees and sticking them in  living room corners; frantically fighting traffic jams while rushing from store to store buying stuff; blasting a certain canon of music from every audio apparatus in the land, drowning all eardrums beneath a warm-and-syrupy tidal wave of simple melodies you hardly ever have to touch any black keys to play; imbibing large quantities of sugar (and sugar’s even more pernicious cousin, alcohol)  in vain hopes that the ensuing rush will  overwhelm seasonal affective disorder and other symptoms of vitamin D deficiency; and in other small ways demonstrating their awed gratitude to the Lord of the Worlds, the All-Merciful All-Compassionate Source of All Being.
Theoretically, all of these activities are supposed to be celebrating the birth of Jesus. According to majoritarian Christian dogma, Yeshua was the “son of God,” whatever that may mean. So what do small coniferous trees in living room corners, frantic shopping and gift-exchanging, mythical big fat white-bearded guys in silly red suits, boozy egg nog and kisses under the mistletoe, etcetera etcetera have to do with the birth of God’s alleged son? The long answer comes from folklorists and historians. The short answer is: “Not a whole lot.”
Our reducing valve of consciousness has reduced the whole “birth of the son of God” concept into something (or a whole lot of little somethings) much, much smaller. But that’s OK, because celebrating the “birth” was already a reduction of the “son of God” concept, which was itself a reduction of the “God” concept, which was itself a reduction of supreme ineffable Reality to which the G-word refers, which…well, let me back up and start at the beginning.
As every “primitive” society on earth knows, everything is conscious. Among pretentious, educated folk,  the philosophical name for that position is panpsychism, also known as panexperientialism. In his recent book God Exists But Gawd Does Not, David Ray Griffin argues that the evidence for a conscious universe, in which everything all the way down to sub-atomic quanta has its own “experience” or “consciousness” or “point of view,” refutes claims that only an omnipotent creator God (pejoratively termed “Gawd” by Griffin) could have created the  miracle of consciousness.
Quantum physics clearly shows that physical reality cannot be separated from consciousness. The observed and observer are two sides of the same reality-coin; remove one, and you’ve removed the whole thing. In other words, science has definitively answered the question “Does a tree fall in the forest if there’s nobody there to hear it?” with a resounding “no.” There is no tree without someone being aware of it. But that “someone” doesn’t necessarily have to be human. The universe (including the illusion of linear unidirectional time) is created by the perceptive acts of conscious biological organisms of all kinds according to Robert Lanza’s Biocentrism. Panexperientialists say these biological universe-creators are actually agglomerations of much smaller conscious entities, all the way down to quarks and quanta.
So what does that have to do with our conception of God not being big enough?
Well, for one thing, God has to be big enough to embrace an outrageous number of perspectives on reality: Not just the reality-perspectives of every one of the world’s more than seven billion people, but also all the animals and plants and their component cells and the building blocks of those cells down to the tiniest sub-atomic building blocks, plus all non-organic matter as well, and the space and time and energy in and in between it.
We might say that God is the very real unity underlying all of that apparent diversity. (Physicists have indeed found traces of a primordial connection linking everything to everything else – faint footprints of the Unity from which multiplicity emerges.)
That is a very big God for small-minded people to constrict.
If there were a last word on God, which there isn’t, it might be:
Allahu akbar!
Which means, “God is greater!” Greater than what? Greater than everything, including all words and conceptions we might try to apply to Him/Her/It.
The natural and  correct human response to such Greatness is awed humility and absolute submission: in a word, islam.
People can be in that state – the state of awed submission to the divine – without  being nominal Muslims.  Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews, Taoists, Native Americans, gnostics, maybe even agnostics can theoretically be muslims with a small m.
But without a traditional scaffolding of wisdom teachings, symbols, rituals, sacred utterances, and a grounding in daily practice, it’s hard to get very deep into that state and stay there. Without that scaffolding, the petty false gods of ones own ego and selfish interests tend to take over.
The history of monotheism is an endless cycle of discoveries of how big God really is, followed by panicked retreats into egotisms and bureaucracies designed to keep Him small. The Hebrew prophets caught glimpses of the divine greatness; then Yahwist priests and scribes conspired to reduce Him to manageable size, and used the resulting misconception to grab wealth and power. Today, the already-massively-reduced figure of Yahweh has been shrunken to almost microscopic size by “modern, liberal, humanist” Jews, who have replaced the whole notion of God with an idolatrous vision of the deified “Jewish people,” whose suffering in the Holocaust amounts to a kind of neo-crucifixion.
Christians, for their part, shrunk Yahweh down by imagining Him as a “father” (and a “son” and a “holy ghost”) while simultaneously enlarging Him from tribal shibboleth to universal creator and caretaker.
The Christian confusion of Jesus the human being, prophet and teacher with God – the koan at the heart of Christianity “how can a man be God?” – was cleared up by Islam. As were many other things.
Yet ironically, Muslims today, despite the clear teachings that have come down to them,  suffer from small-minded views of God right alongside the Christians and Jews. Those who are termed “fundamentalists” (who might be better termed obscurantists)  imagine that God’s main concern is that they follow a long list of very detailed rules governing trivial activities of daily life. Some of these folks are fanatical sectarians who think that everyone who doesn’t agree with them is a lesser being at best, deserving of capital punishment at worst. These boneheaded takfiris seem blind to the almost infinitely varied perspectives that the real God must be able to embrace!
So this Christmas, or at Friday salaat al-jumuah, or wherever and whenever you have an opportunity to pray, please consider making the following supplication:
Ya Allah, o God, please save us from people whose conception of You is too small; and help our own conceptions grow ever-larger, even though we know they will never fully embrace your Reality.

Monday, December 19, 2016

My Denver talk on "Recent False Flags" (including Orlando)



Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror. Here he discusses his latest work questioning recent terror attacks including the Paris attacks, the Pulse nightclub attack and others.

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Debating "liberal humanitarian Zionist" on the battle for Aleppo



Press TV Debate: Veterans Today Editor Kevin Barrett vs. Brent Budowski

Russia says Moscow and Washington are close to reaching an understanding over the crisis in Aleppo. The Western side is pushing for a ceasefire in eastern Aleppo just as Syrian troops are coming close to liberating the city.
Kevin Barrett, author and Middle East expert from Madison, told Press TV on Thursday night that the US-led front and media are waging a propaganda campaign to force Syria to stop retaking eastern Aleppo.
Barrett said since the United States needs to continue its proxy war in Syria, Washington resorts to any kind of tactics to impede the annihilation of the foreign-backed terrorists who are besieged in eastern Aleppo.
“These folks (the US and allies) who are dedicated to keeping this war going as long as possible and destroying Syria as long as possible find that very convenient to call for a ceasefire right at the moment that the [Syrian] government is taking the city,” he said.
Barrett said Syria’s “legitimate government has been targeted for overthrowing and regime change by a group of countries that created this horrific extremist ISIS-style mercenaries.”
“The US empire with its Zionist controllers are destroying Syria in an act of aggression,” he said, adding “the biggest winner of all of this destabilization of course is the expansionist [regime] in Tel Aviv.”
“This is an intentional destruction and destabilization of Syria along a kind of US imperial and Zionist doctrine that calls for the actual destruction and Balkanization of the Middle Eastern countries to make them more penetrable by the empire and to make them less of a potential long- and medium-term threat to Israel,” Barrett added.
The analyst said the Syrian government is justified in its war on terrorists despite the “horrific destruction in Aleppo and all over Syria,” while it has also offered an amnesty for all Syrians.
“Any country in the world is going to use counter-insurgency warfare to preserve its territorial integrity if there is this kind of foreign-sponsored rebellion going on.”
According to Barrett, “a lot of people in the region and a few people outside the region like Russian President Vladimir Putin” have got in the way of the US-led coalition which tried to turn Syria into a failed state.
Brent Budowsky, a columnist with US newspaper The Hill from Washington, called on Syria and Russia to halt military operations in the eastern Aleppo.
“We need a ceasefire today. We should have had it a year ago or two years ago,” he said.
The Syrian army troops and their allied forces are now in control of about 85 percent of militant-held eastern part of Aleppo as they press ahead with an all-out offensive to fully dislodge foreign-backed terrorists from the northwestern city.

Sunday, November 27, 2016

Activist Angel vs. Kevin Barrett on "DC Pizzagate"



Video above: Truth vs. NEW$ 11/24 broadcast on Seattle cable access TV
When Pastor Don Grahn invited me to pre-record a  Truth vs. NEW$ interview, I had no idea what was coming.
I assumed it would be about Middle East politics, Islamic studies, or false flags, my three main areas of expertise. I even hoped to talk about my new edited book Orlando False Flag.
Instead, the guest host, Activist Angel, began excitedly haranguing me about the so-called “pizza-gate” scandal: Allegations that Wiki-leaked John Podesta emails exposed a pedophile pizzeria. WHY WASN’T VETERANS TODAY COVERING THIS MOMENTOUS STORY? the host kept yelling.
The problem: I had scanned the pizza-gate allegations and they didn’t strike me as credible. So I hadn’t bothered to study them, or even read them carefully. I had no idea the subject was on the agenda.
After recording the above interview, I took Activist Angel’s advice and looked at the DC Pizzagate website. I discovered that he had been right about one thing: It’s disgusting. But is this really evidence of a pedophile ring? Or is it a disgusting witch hunt slandering people some of whom may have sick and twisted taste in art and photography, or social media friends who have such tastes,  but who are not by any means child traffickers?
If the latter is the case, a lot of innocent people are having their good names sullied by a bunch of reckless idiots.
It looks to me like anonymous internet sleuths/witch-hunters have been going through the social media accounts of everybody connected to Comet Pizzeria and misconstruing playful pictures of people’s kids. Some of those pictures are in very bad taste. Others, like Tamera Luzzato’s picture of her grandchildren, seem completely innocent. None are convincing evidence of child trafficking.
The DC-Pizzagate website (and its legion of over-excited followers) seem to be trying  too hard to connect the dots. They are too affected by the emotional impact of child trafficking (which really does happen, and is indeed horrifying) to think clearly. They imagine that because John Podesta owns a statue that looks a bit like a drawing by serial killer Jeffrey Dahmer then Podesta must kill and eat people like Dahmer did. They imagine that generically sick-and-twisted punk rock posters advertising punk rock events are something much more sinister. They imagine that “ping pong tables in the basement” of a public restaurant with a ping pong table theme must be code for abusing children.
Is somebody ODing on brown acid?
And if “pizza” is code for “child trafficking” then pretty much everybody must be a child trafficker, since pretty much everybody eats pizza.
During our interview, Activist Angel kept referencing real child trafficking scandals as if they were related to, and proof of, DC Pizzagate. He tried to wield the very real Franklin scandal, among others, as proof that DC Pizzagate must be exactly what its advocates claim. It struck me as a classic case of fallacious, muddled thinking.
I studied urban legends, among other genres, as part of my Ph.D. minor in Folklore. This Pizzagate material has the feel of an urban legend…sort of like the “Wal-Marts are being re-tooled as detention camps” meme from the Jade Helm era.
Both the “Wal-Mart = concentration camp” and “pizzeria = child trafficking” memes take a comfortingly familiar institutional public gathering place – the leading big box mega-store on the one hand, the friendly neighborhood pizza joint on the other – and re-imagine it as something hideously sinister. Folklorist Patricia Turner studied similar rumors in the African-American community that Church’s Fried Chicken was a plot to sterilize black people.
In all three instances, the public fears expressed in the legends are well-grounded. Child trafficking really exists, and elite pedophile networks really do have tremendous power, as exposed in Nick Bryant’s The Franklin Scandal, John DeCamp’s The Franklin Cover-up, and the film Conspiracy of Silence.
Jade Helm, too, was a panic based on legitimate fears. Plans for mass internment and martial law undoubtedly do exist, and the police state is completely out of control.
As for African-Americans and Church’s Fried Chicken, Rockefeller-funded eugenics efforts really have targeted black people in sinister ways. And don’t get me started about the Tuskegee syphilis studies.
Assuming all three of these cases – DC Pizzagate, Jade Helm, and Church’s Fried Chicken Sterilization – are urban legends, should we interpret them as purely spontaneous public panics? Or might these and/or other “false and harmful conspiracy theories” actually be conspiracies to spread bad conspiracy theories?

Is “fake news” a problem-reaction-solution technique to “cognitively infiltrate” and “disable” alternative media?
We are seeing major pushback against “fake news.” The government, big media, and internet giants like Facebook and Google are being pressured to put a lid on alternative media. Bogus “conspiracy theories” that harm innocent people are a perfect excuse to ban all “conspiracy theories” including the true ones. Next thing you know, “WTC-7 a Controlled Demolition” will be scrubbed from the internet as “fake news.”
This is exactly what Cass Sunstein meant when he argued that the government should “disable the purveyors of (9/11) conspiracy theories” by “cognitively infiltrating” conspiracy groups and spreading “beneficial cognitive diversity.” Panic and confusion spread by urban legends like Jade Helm and DC Pizzagate “disable” the “purveyors of conspiracy theories” (the alternative media) not only by promoting irrationality, but also by preparing the way for a crackdown on “fake news.”
Then there is the partisan political dirty tricks angle. Somebody seeded the Jade Helm panic. Why? Could it have been a right-wing anti-Obama political move? “Get very, very angry, conservative white people! That evil black President is coming to take your guns and – get this – lock you up in Wal-Mart!”
Might this pizza-gate thing also be a synthetically manufactured urban legend, another anti-Democrat dirty trick from the usual suspects? A key figure in pizza-gate — and a rather tenuous connection between Comet Pizza and the Clinton campaign – is David Brock, a former Republican dirty trickster turned whistleblower. Is Brock being punished for blowing the whistle on the likes of Karl Rove? Are his old colleagues pulling a fast one on him?
I don’t pretend to have all the answers. But I am 90%+ sure that innocent people, including innocent kids, are being dragged through the mud by the Pizzagate lynch mob. Grabbing pictures of people’s kids from social media and misconstruing them in this incredibly hurtful way could whip up public support for a crackdown on alternative media. And if alternative media are banned, we will be left with nothing to counter the boring, predictable, propagandizing fake news of the mainstream.

Wednesday, November 9, 2016

"Nobody saw it coming" ?! We called the election last March 27th!

This was predictable – thank the pro-Hillary Establishment and sheeple who supported her

Flashback to last March 27th - here is my radio show listing:

Musa al-Gharbi: Hillary Clinton will lose to Donald Trump


Listen to the interview at at http://noliesradio.org/archives/112321

Bernie Sanders just crushed Hillary Clinton in Washington, Alaska, and Hawaii, with 73%, 82%, and 71% of the vote, respectively. That's good news for the Democrats – because Hillary has exactly zero chance of winning a general election against Trump, while Bernie at least has a chance.

Today's guest Musa al-Gharbi explains why in his article "Hillary Clinton Will Lose to Donald Trump":

"What matters for the general election is who can win swing states and ensure high voter turnout and enthusiasm in solidly blue states..."

Perhaps even more important is that Hillary has such high negatives, and is plagued by so many scandals, that Trump's attacks will annihilate her ... at least if she hasn't gone to prison by the time next fall rolls around.

Bernie Sanders, by contrast, is as squeaky-clean as American politicians get, has a lovable underdog, grandfatherly manner that defuses negative campaigning, and has the populist appeal to take the wind out of Trump's sails.

What it boils down to is, a vote for Hillary is a vote for President Trump.


Monday, October 17, 2016

Dear John Podesta, The THREE San Bernardino terrorists WERE white! Here's proof

These patsies were set up and executed. Witnesses described three large white paramilitaries doing the shooting.

Sent to: podesta@law.georgetown.edu

Dear John Podesta,

According to one of your leaked emails, your response to the San Bernardino shooting last December was to hope the terrorist turned out to be white.

I am pleased to be – for once – the bearer of good news.

Your wish has been granted.

Available on Amazon
Multiple eyewitness reports confirm that the actual shooters in San Bernardino were three large white paramilitaries – not the brown-skinned Muslim couple that was executed shortly afterward. (Had the couple been guilty, no effort would have been spared to take them alive, so they could be interrogated and their presumed network taken down; but instead, they were handcuffed and shot execution-style, as helicopter video and other evidence shows.)

You can find the eyewitness reports using a search engine. But to make things really easy for you, I have documented the evidence in a crossover scholarly book entitled ANOTHER French False Flag? Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino. It is the second in my False Flag Trilogy featuring 55 leading public intellectuals asking the hard questions about recent "terror" events...including the Belle Equipe shooting in Paris, which was also – you will be happy to hear – committed by large white paramilitaries.

I am taking the liberty of sending a copy to your Georgetown Law office at:

  • 600 New Jersey Avenue N.W.
    Washington, DC 20001
Sincerely,

Dr. Kevin Barrett, Editor
ANOTHER French False Flag? Bloody Tracks from Paris to San Bernardino






Thursday, October 13, 2016

"Recent False Flags" lecture packs the house in Denver

A full house of 40+ people packed the Journeys for Conscious Living/Unity Church between Denver and Boulder, CO Monday evening to learn about "Recent False Flags." The event was recorded and should be available on-line soon. Keep an eye on this blog...

Friday, October 7, 2016

The PLANTED weaponized image that got Professor Anthony Hall suspended

See my article:


Those concerned about the B’nai Brith’s assault on Professor Anthony Hall can contact Lethbridge University President Mike Mahon. Email: mike.mahon@uleth.ca and cc contactmeliorist@gmail.com  program@ckxu.com  antoniusjameshall@gmail.com 
Write, fax, or phone: Mike Mahon President & Vice-Chancellor A762 University Hall, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada  T1K 3M4. Phone: (403) 329 -2201. Fax: (403) 329-2097. 

Petition demanding that Kurt E. Schlacter step down as Chair of the University of Lethbridge

Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Indigenous Worldview and the Art of Transformation: A Book Review by Rafiq


Indigenous Worldview and the Art of Transformation
Rafiq

Book review / Four Arrows, Point of Departure:Returning to Our More Authentic Worldview for Education and Survival (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2016).

We all have a worldview, an idea about the nature of reality. We may not be conscious of it, but we do. It shapes our thinking and our actions. Likewise, the worldview that is dominant at any point in history shapes our societies. If we wish to address the imbalances in ourselves and in our societies, we need to understand that these imbalances are the product of our worldview. Moreover, we need to recognize that the worldview that created the problems faced by the world cannot be used to fix them. For real solutions, we must look to our original worldview – the one that allowed us to live in relative harmony with our planet and with one another for most of human history.  

This is the argument of Indigenous elder and scholar Four Arrows in Point of Departure: Returning to Our More Authentic Worldview for Education and Survival. He estimates that between 5,000 and 10,000 years ago, we began to depart from “a moral order that bound all life together.” This moral order was a product of Indigenous worldview. Since that time, we have evolved an anthropocentric moral order that separates life based on hierarchy. This moral order is a product of Western worldview. Four Arrows contends that all religious, cultural, and moral systems are not worldviews unto themselves but are expressions of one or the other of these two worldviews. 

Before the point of departure, Indigenous worldview regarded what we might call “God” as inseparable from humans, non-humans, and the rest of Nature. In this sense, all of life was seen to be inspirited. After the point of departure, which was perhaps prompted by the advent of agricultural surpluses and the resulting sense that we had mastered Nature, Western worldview came to regard “God” as separate from creation. This distinction between the interconnectedness of all and the separation of all explains the differences between Indigenous worldview and Western worldview.

Because Indigenous thinking has been repressed and Western thinking has become dominant, the two worldviews are no longer in balance. The negative outcomes of this imbalance range from a likely “sixth mass extinction” to “religious dogma, absolute rule, class hierarchy, military expansion, slavery, land ownership, economic debt, domination of women, greed, jealousy, a centralized system of government (the state), and large-scale war.” Four Arrows explains that balance can be restored only by means of Indigenous ways: “Recognizing and implementing the ancient pre-departure beliefs will enable us to understand that we are truly connected, and allow us to realize peace, respect, and sustainability again for the benefit of all human and non-human beings. It would be a mind shift from mutually assured destruction to mutually assured survival.”

More than a philosophical treatise, Point of Departure is a handbook on Indigenous practice. Coupling Western scientific investigation with Indigenous self-authored experience, Four Arrows not only offers evidence of the many phenomena attributed to Indigenous practice but also equips readers to adopt Indigenous methods themselves. He explains, “Theory is combined with recommendations for learning and praxis, and exercises are suggested for actualizing personal and, ultimately, global transformation.”

To this end, Point of Departure focuses on five aspects of Indigenous practice that can help to correct the imbalances of our Western thinking: trance-based learning, courage and fearlessness, community-oriented self-authorship, sacred communication, and the idea of Nature as All. To emphasize the holistic interdependence of these five aspects, Four Arrows places trance at the center of a figurative Medicine Wheel whose four cardinal directions are fearauthoritywords, and Nature. In this way, the reader is reminded that the outcome of all trance-based learning is determined by one’s orientation to each of these four other aspects of Indigenous practice.

Trance refers to states of consciousness at the lower alpha and theta brainwave frequencies. Alpha is a state of light trance, and theta is a state of deep trance. Unlike the higher beta brainwave frequency of waking consciousness, trance frequencies give one access to “wisdom that is independent from reason and ego.” Four Arrows explains that this wisdom arises from “a vital energy within us and in the world, the source of which is creation itself.” Because Western worldview largely ignores this energetic realm in favor of the material realm, it denies that “all experience happens in two worlds at the same time.” Thus it “prevents us from fully learning.” Achieved through self-hypnosis and meditation, trance states can help us to undo negative subconscious programming by instilling new thinking, which in turn can lead to new behaviors. Point of Departure is full of firsthand accounts of how this process works, as well as simple techniques that anyone can use for the betterment of all. 

Fear relates directly to trance because in a state of heightened fear, we can enter a trance state and become unknowingly susceptible to subconscious programming by others. Owing to its grounding in trace-based learning, Indigenous worldview protects one from such external manipulation by orienting one toward internal energetic wisdom. It recognizes that one’s sense of separation from the inspirited realm is the source of fear and that courage is thus derived from realization of one’s interconnectedness with all. This kind of courage is not rooted in dogmatic certainty about reality but in acceptance of the unknown. The inspirited realm is regarded as the “Great Mysterious” – “an unexplainable power that manifests through countless beings, spirits, and matter.” When such courage accompanies our actions, we can become fearless enough to be selfless on behalf of others. Generosity is the highest expression of courage. Point of Departure offers metacognitive strategies for facing our fears so that we are not weakened by them but are able to use them to achieve personal transformation and to practice virtues.

Authority relates directly to trance because trance-based learning fosters internal authority and self-authorship. This type of authority frees one from dependence on external authority, protecting one from potential misdirection. It also emphasizes that “the highest authority for all decisions comes from one’s personal, honest reflection on lived experience with the understanding that everything is related.” Thus Indigenous self-authority is rooted in firsthand knowledge but is oriented toward the community and the greater good rather than toward ego fulfillment. This focus on the community ensures a balance between the individual and the collective – in contrast to Western worldview’s emphasis on obedience to external authority for the good of a few. Within Indigenous societies, this balance is further reflected in the fact that authority is nonanthropocentric, nonhierarchical, and noncentralized. Point of Departure provides concrete ways to determine the sources of authority that guide our decisions and actions so that we might embody our full potential as individuals on behalf of the human community.

Words relate directly to trance because the language that we use in self-hypnosis to instill subconscious ideas has a critical impact on the effectiveness of this practice. For example, negative words like not or won’t should be avoided because they “do not form images in the mind.” In contrast, positive phrasing that uses the present progressive verb tense results in active images that facilitate creative visualization and orient one toward change. This orientation is at the heart of Indigenous worldview and is evident in Indigenous languages themselves, which “emphasize process, subjectivity, transformation, and living connections with a more verb-oriented structure.” In contrast, “Indo-European languages emphasize categories, objectivity, permanence, and a separation from Nature with a more noun-oriented syntax.” 

The Indigenous orientation toward transformation is spiritual, as reflected in the fact that “the concept of god is a verb in most Indigenous languages. For example, in Lakota, Wakan Tanka (god) is literally the ‘great mysteriousing.’” Point of Departure shows us how to balance the left-brain language favored by Western worldview by using Indigenous right-brain language to “more authentically describe reality, enhance relational ethics, reduce deception, and manage unconscious thoughts and behaviors.”

Nature relates directly to trance because the “vital energy” that we access while in a trance state is the same energy that animates the world. Just as we can commune with this energy through self-hypnosis and meditation, we can commune with this energy when we are immersed in Nature and mindful of the wisdom that Nature imparts. Indigenous worldview regards Nature as the ultimate teacher and source of experiential learning. Vision quests, for example, are done while one is alone in Nature. And animals can model right behavior, demonstrate the interconnectedness of all, and symbolize spiritual lessons particular to one’s own circumstances. In contrast, Western worldview fosters a separation from Nature that deprives us of this kind of knowledge. Moreover, its hierarchical “discrimination against Nature” is “the foundation for human discrimination against other humans.” Without a spiritual connection with Nature, we have lost our spiritual connection with one another. For the good of our human relations and the salvation of our ecosystems, Point of Departure implores you to “be courageous in using what you learn from Nature in word and deed to bring balance back into the world.”

The chapters on each direction of Four Arrows’ Medicine Wheel employ a range of Western scholarship and Indigenous experiential knowledge to illustrate the differences between Indigenous worldview and Western worldview. The chapter on trance-based learning includes a complement to the ideas of Miguel Ruiz in The Four Agreements. The chapter on courage and fearlessness includes an overview of Western philosophy’s idea of courage alongside an account of how both Mohandas Gandhi and Huston Smith led lives that demonstrated Indigenous transformative learning. The chapter on community-oriented self-authorship includes a discussion of MRI studies confirming that whole-brain functioning is enhanced when Indigenous right-brain orientations toward fear are combined with Western left-brain knowledge. The chapter on sacred communication includes a comparison of the linguistic theories of Benjamin Lee Whorf and Noam Chomsky. The chapter on Nature as All includes an assessment of the life of Ohiyesa (aka Charles A. Eastman), a Santee Dakota who graduated from Boston University School of Medicine in 1890 and straddled the Indigenous and Western worlds.

Point of Departure does not claim that the holistic orientation of Indigenous worldview is unique to Indigenous peoples or that the individualistic orientation of Western worldview is unique to Western peoples. Rather, the holistic and the individualistic orientations are two halves of a single whole. Each is one half of the human mind. Thus each is a product of human experience. What Indigenous worldview shows is that Indigenous peoples actively worked to maintain a balance between the two by coupling their left-brain material experience with their right-brain spiritual experience. They were well aware of the risks of moving too far in one direction or the other. Four Arrows writes, “The ancient stories helped to create cultures that held on to the balance because of what they taught.”

Today, the excesses of Western worldview have produced forces that are intentionally, systematically, and maliciously working against our collective best interests. But the solution does not lie in fighting the left-brain system with left-brain approaches. The worldview that created our problems cannot be used to fix them. Rather, the solution lies in adopting right-brain practices that can complement our Western worldview. The battle is a spiritual one, and we must become Indigenous warriors. Four Arrows writes, “If the reader uses this unique Medicine Wheel and its interactions to consider daily choices, feelings, problems and deep-seated beliefs, my vision tells me we have a chance to help restore the world for the seventh generation.” 

Point of Departure is a unique and profound book. It offers a lucid presentation of ideas that are often rendered in the overly abstract language of metaphysics. This is a huge achievement! More than that, it presents simple techniques for putting Indigenous worldview into practice. Perhaps most remarkable is its appendix, where Four Arrows tells two personal stories that illustrate the effectiveness of Indigenous methods – stories whose outcomes are “miracles” when seen through Western worldview but are fully understandable when seen through Indigenous worldview. Anyone can achieve similar outcomes using trance-based learning. It’s a matter of remembering that “fear offers an opportunity to practice a virtue; authority comes only from honest reflection on lived experience with the realization that everything is related; words and other forms of communication are understood as sacred vibrations; and Nature is the ultimate teacher.”

Point of Departure: Returning to Our More Authentic Worldview for Education and Survival is available at https://www.amazon.com/Point-Departure-Returning-Authentic-Worldview/dp/1681235900.

Four Arrows teaches in the School of Educational Leadership for Change at Fielding Graduate University in Santa Barbara, California. Among  his twenty-one books are Teaching Truly: A Curriculum to Indigenize Mainstream Education (2013), The Authentic Dissertation: Alternative Ways of Knowing, Research and Representation (2008), and Primal Awareness: A True Story of Survival, Transformation and Awakening with the Raramuri Shamans of Mexico (1997). 

Rafiq wrote his first book, Gaj: The End of Religion (2004), to counter the idea of “God” as an individual who could take sides in the “war on terror.” His memoir Days of Shock, Days of Wonder (2016) tells the story of his confrontation with the spiritual and cognitive dissonance of the 9/11 age. His documentaries Be Smile: The Stories of Two Urban Inuit (2006) and Khanqah: A Sufi Place (2011) are online at Vimeo.










Friday, September 9, 2016

Rafiq: Indigenous Wisdom Explains Hypnosis of the 9/11 Lie

Here is a 9/11 anniversary guest post by Rafiq, who has discussed "Hitler's Blue Eyes" and "GAJ" on Truth Jihad Radio.


Indigenous Wisdom Explains Hypnosis of the 9/11 Lie
Rafiq


Earlier this year, I published a memoir that entwines two stories, one political and the other spiritual. For me, the two cannot be separated. The title of the memoir is Days of Shock, Days of Wonder: The 9/11 Age, the Ways of the Mystics, and One Man’s Escape from Babylon in the Belly of a Whale.[1] On the political side of the story are the 9/11 lie and my days of activism for truth in Montreal. On the spiritual side of the story are the mystical teachings that I encountered among India’s “wild” Sufis and among various Indigenous peoples, from the Inuit of Canada’s North to the Huichol shamans of Mexico to the renowned elder and scholar Four Arrows, who I met in a remote Mexican village in 2010 while traveling and living in a 1984 Volkswagen Vanagon, the “whale” of the book’s title.

As the movement for 9/11 truth grew throughout the 2000s, especially after YouTube went online in 2005, it became increasingly easy to debunk the government’s official 9/11 narrative. Notably, in 2006 the FBI admitted that there is no evidence implicating Osama bin Laden in the crime.[2] So we don’t officially know who carried out the attack. In 2008 the National Institute of Standards and Technology admitted that its report to the 9/11 Commission does not explain the total collapse of the towers.[3] So we don’t officially know how the attack was carried out. And in 2009 a group of scientists from the United States and Europe found “red/gray chips” of explosive residue in dust samples taken from four locations at ground zero.[4] It was the smoking gun!

Without 9/11 truth, there can be no justice for the murdered, no end to the “war on terror,” and no repeal of the fascist laws enforced in Babylon since 9/11. Yet time and again during my days of truth activism, my attempts to explain the unraveling of the official 9/11 story were met with hostility. For a long time, I couldn't understand why otherwise sensible and well-educated people became emotional and irrational when told that the story about bin Laden, the hijackers, and the melting towers came from the government of George W. Bush, not from the investigators and the scientists. It was not until I met Four Arrows that I found an answer. More than that, I came to understand the ongoing effect of the 9/11 lie on the psyches of the millions of people who are still unaware that they have been deceived.

The excerpt below from my memoir describes what Four Arrows taught me about the hypnosis of the 9/11 lie. I share it with you here in the hope that the negative psychological transformation experienced by many on 9/11 can be reversed. Only then can our blind fear and subjugation be converted into wide-eyed fearlessness and resistance to the schemes of those who brought us 9/11 and who continue to bring us all manner of terror.


Excerpt

Four Arrows showed me some books in his library. “These ones I wrote,” he said. He was a professor and the author of twenty titles in a handful of fields. He’d been a paramedic, a hypnotist for surgical patients who couldn’t be put under using drugs, and a trainer of wild mustangs. He handed me a book. “In this one, several scholars and I prove that the official story about 9/11 is a lie,” he said.[5] I handed it back.

“I don’t need to read it,” I said. I told him about my days in the truth movement, the petition to the Canadian government for a new investigation of the attack, the March on Ottawa. I told him that I was done with it. I chose a book he’d written called Primal Awareness: A True Story of Awakening and Transformation with the Raramuri Shamans of Mexico.[6] I wanted to forget the political and learn about the Indigenous. But I would soon see that the wisdom of the second had a lot to say about the evil of the first. Like it or not, I’d come back around to the attack of 2001.

In Primal Awareness I learned that in a heightened state of focus we were susceptible to suggestion and change. Indigenous peoples entered this state through intentional trance in order to deepen learning. By means of ceremony, vision quests, chanting, dancing, endurance, or plant medicine, they achieved what Four Arrows called “concentration activated transformation.”

I also learned that trance could be spontaneous. Especially when triggered by fear. In such cases we were in danger of being hypnotized. Indigenous peoples understood this phenomenon but were not vulnerable to it because when facing the fearful they drew on authority rooted in experience. They used words whose vibrations had been honed by integrity. And they turned to nature as the ultimate ground of their wisdom. This respect for authority, words, and nature meant that Indigenous peoples were able to use fear as an opportunity to practice a virtue like courage. It could be a source of growth.

While traveling to his first meeting with the Raramuri, Four Arrows had experienced a spontaneous concentration activated transformation. He was kayaking in Mexico’s Copper Canyon with a friend when a flash flood made the river rise by many feet. After the rain stopped they kept going. But the current had turned mean and Four Arrows’ kayak capsized. He was pulled into a tunnel of water in the rock and was sure that he would drown. He let go of his fear and grew calm. He saw the people he loved and said goodbye. He gave into nature and let the current carry his body. At last he was shot back out into the river. He was alive. But changed. He felt new power and purpose. He discovered new sensibilities. With the Raramuri he saw visions that first revealed to him the role of concentration in deep transformation. Later he learned that the tunnel in the rock or one like it had once been used in shaman initiation rites. If the apprentice panicked and thrashed about, he lost the current and was carried into one of two side tunnels that dead-ended. He drowned.

In his past work both as a paramedic and as a horse trainer, Four Arrows had seen how fear could cause spontaneous trance. When studying to be a paramedic, he was told to be careful not to say anything negative to trauma victims. He reasoned that if saying something negative could be harmful, then saying something positive might help. So he started to experiment on trauma victims at accident scenes. He told a woman trapped in a car wreck to stop her head from bleeding while the firemen freed her. She did. He told her to start the bleeding again when she was out of the car so that he could clean the gash. She did. He told an electrocuted man to start his heart while they waited for the ambulance to get there. The man did. And he survived. Later he reported hearing everything Four Arrows had said. These people were susceptible to hypnosis because they were in a fear-induced state of heightened concentration.

Four Arrows had been well known for breaking wild mustangs. Once he was asked to work with a domesticated horse that refused to cross the shallow part of a stream. No matter what he tried, the animal wouldn’t do it. Four Arrows didn’t understand what made this horse different from the wild ones. Then he figured it out. The horse wasn’t afraid. So he walked it to where the stream was deepest and shoved it into the water. It came out terrified. Now he had its attention. Twenty minutes later the horse was trotting back and forth across the shallow part of the stream without a care.

I saw that our fear during the attack of 2001 had put us into a collective state of spontaneous trance. I realized that the images on our TVs of people being murdered in real time had been used to change us for the worse. In the moment of crisis George W. Bush was the voice of authority. He told us that the culprits were al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden. His words brooked no dissent and rallied all to revenge. Common sense was forgotten. Intuition was suppressed. There was no appeal to our deeper nature. Most of us were hypnotized into believing a story that was implausible even on its surface. It should have been obvious that the US military couldn’t have been fooled by a bunch of guys with box cutters and no flying skills.[7]

I understood why the shock and awe of the attack had made us dumb, why intelligent people got so angry when you told them the truth. We’d suffered a negative concentration activated transformation. We’d been brainwashed.

Four Arrows hadn’t believed the hijacker story for a second. The day after the attack he told an assembly of university students not to forget the US government’s history of staging terror and blaming it on others. When Bush’s lies about Iraq led to war in 2003, he posted photos outside his office of Iraqi children killed by US soldiers. The dean of his faculty tore them down every day and finally bullied him into leaving. He’d taken a professorship elsewhere and now only worked with graduate students via the Internet. Self-exiled in Mexico.

Rafiq wrote his first book, Gaj: The End of Religion (2004), to counter the idea of “God” as an individual who could take sides in the “war on terror.” His memoir Days of Shock, Days of Wonder (2016) tells the story of his confrontation with the spiritual and cognitive dissonance of the 9/11 age. His documentaries Be Smile: The Stories of Two Urban Inuit (2006) and Khanqah: A Sufi Place (2011) are online at Vimeo.

Notes

[1] Rafiq, Days of Shock, Days of Wonder: The 9/11 Age, the Ways of the Mystics, and One Man’s Escape from Babylon in the Belly of a Whale (Montreal: Hay River Books, 2016), https://www.amazon.com/Days-Shock-Wonder-Mystics-Babylon/dp/0973656115.
[2] M. Chossudovsky, “Osama bin Laden, among the FBI’s ‘Ten Most Wanted Fugitives’: Why Was He Never Indicted for His Alleged Role in 9/11?” 17 September 2006, http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=3246.
[3] S.E. Jones et al., “Fourteen Points of Agreement with Official Government Reports on the World Trade Center Destruction,” Open Civil Engineering Journal, no. 2 (2008): 35–40, http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCIEJ/TOCIEJ-2-35.pdf.
[4] N.H. Harrit et al., “Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe,” Open Chemical Physics Journal 2, no. 1 (3 April 2009): 7–31, http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOCPJ/TOCPJ-2-7.pdf.
[5] P. Zarembka, ed., The Hidden History of 9-11 (New York: Seven Stories, 2008), https://www.amazon.com/Hidden-History-9-11/dp/158322825X.
[6] D.T. Jacobs (Four Arrows), Primal Awareness: A True Story of Awakening and Transformation with the Raramuri Shamans of Mexico (Rochester, VT: Inner Traditions International, 1998), https://www.amazon.com/Primal-Awareness-Survival-Transformation-Awakening/dp/0892816694. See also Four Arrows, Point of Departure: Returning to Our More Authentic Worldview for Education and Survival (Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, 2016), https://www.amazon.com/Point-Departure-Returning-Authentic-Worldview/dp/1681235900.
[7] “Hani Hanjour: 9/11 Pilot Extraordinaire,” http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/hanjour.html; M.H. Gaffney, “How the FBI and 9/11 Commission Suppressed Key Evidence about Hani Hanjour, Alleged Hijack Pilot of AAL 77,” 9 July 2009, http://www.globalresearch.ca/how-the-fbi-and-9-11-commission-suppressed-key-evidence-about-hani-hanjour-alleged-hijack-pilot-of-aal-77/14290.